- say that we need more child care spaces;
- promise that, under the Tories, health care would be improved (it's universal and "rightly so," he noted);
- argue that we need a balanced approach to crime -- not just enforcement, but also crime prevention in the form of creating more opportunities for youth;
- praise Manitoba Hydro as a publicly-owned monopoly and vow never to sell it; and
- refuse to commit to reducing or eliminating the payroll tax even though he recognizes it's a "bad tax."
He's sounding more like a New Democrat every day. Of course, he might just have softened his tone thinking that CBC listeners would be more liberal than most voters, but still...
It's always the goal of a successful party to drub their opponents so badly and for so long that the opponents cede the terms and language of the debate and sit back clinging to the faint hope that some amorphous mood for change somehow sweeps them into office. If and when the opposition wins, they are so stripped of their own ideas and policies (often through promises that they won't do this or won't do that) and so used to promoting those of the governing party that all they can do is meekly follow the course that's been set. It amounts to losing even when you've won.
In this so far sleepy campaign, Hugh's going to need a whole lot more than a "pray for change" strategy to wind up Premier after May 22. I sure wouldn't want to be sitting in the Tory back rooms right now.
The photo is of the Kennedy-Nixon debate, 1960.
No comments:
Post a Comment